Accessibility Product Conformance Report - WCAG 2.1 AA VPAT

Name of Product/Version

Startup Wars

Report Date

April 15, 2026

Product Description

Startup Wars is a web-based educational application that includes an instructor portal, a student portal, and interactive entrepreneurship simulations.

Evaluation Methods Used

The Startup Wars application was evaluated using Google Chrome on a MacBook Pro 2019 laptop. Assistive technologies used in this evaluation included NVDA (screen reader) and Apple’s VoiceOver screenreader as well as exclusive use of the keyboard to navigate and operate the application content and functionality.

Conformance Summary

We strive to meet WCAG 2.1 AA and are actively improving accessibility. Startup Wars “Partially Supports WCAG 2.1 Level A and Level AA”. This is the most accurate overall statement for the current application based on the reviewed accessibility evidence. The instructor portal, student portal, simulation shell UI, simulation HUDs, overlays, dialogs, setup flows, report flows, and shared interface components show substantial accessibility remediation work. At the same time, the available evidence does not support a claim of full WCAG 2.1 AA conformance across every route, dialog, simulation state, and assistive technology scenario.

Evaluated Scope

This report covers the following Startup Wars product areas:

  • Instructor portal
  • Student portal
  • Simulation shell UI and surrounding simulation interfaces, including HUDs, dialogs, overlays, setup flows, reports, and shared simulation support components

The reviewed evidence includes documented accessibility remediation across the current product surface, generated component inventory coverage, and automated accessibility smoke testing for selected login, teacher, student, and simulation-launch flows.

Scope Notes

  • The Startup Wars accessibility program documents broad accessibility remediation across the instructor portal, student portal, and simulation-related web UI.
  • The current accessibility inventory reports zero remaining automated issues across 320 inventoried templates.
  • The same evidence also indicates that manual verification and full documentation coverage are still in progress, which prevents a fully conformant claim at this time.
  • For WCAG 2.1 SC 1.4.10 Reflow, the essential 2D Phaser gameplay surface is treated as exempt where two-dimensional interaction is fundamental to the activity. This exception does not apply to the surrounding web UI, including menus, overlays, dialogs, HUD text, controls, and support flows.

Conformance Terms

Supports: The available evidence indicates the product meets the success criterion in the evaluated scope.

Partially Supports: The product appears to meet the success criterion in significant areas, but current evidence also shows gaps, incomplete validation, or remaining scope areas that are not yet fully substantiated.

Does Not Support: The available evidence shows the product does not meet the success criterion.

Not Applicable: The success criterion does not apply to the evaluated scope.

Not Evaluated: There is not enough evidence to determine conformance.

Product Area Summary

Product Area

Conformance Level

Summary

Instructor portal

Partially Supports

The instructor portal shows significant remediation across dashboards, class and assignment flows, simulation tables, billing flows, publish flows, navigation, and dialogs. Existing automated accessibility smoke coverage is helpful, but the current evidence does not substantiate complete WCAG 2.1 AA conformance across all instructor routes and states.

Student portal

Partially Supports

The student portal shows meaningful remediation across dashboards, classes, assignment selection, simulation launch paths, modals, and accessible naming. Automated accessibility smoke coverage exists for key student flows, but complete end-to-end assistive technology validation across all student states is not yet substantiated.

Simulations

Partially Supports

The simulation-related web UI shows extensive remediation across setup flows, tutorials, overlays, HUDs, reports, store flows, goals, crop, equipment, marketing, and shared simulation UI. The current evidence is not strong enough to claim complete WCAG 2.1 AA conformance for all live simulation states and interactive gameplay scenarios.

WCAG 2.1 Level A

Criteria

Conformance Level

Remarks and Explanations

1.1.1 Non-text Content

Partially Supports

Substantial remediation has been documented for alt text, decorative image handling, charts, cards, dashboards, simulation tables, HUD components, and repeated simulation UI patterns. Remaining manual follow-up is still required for some components to confirm that all meaningful images, charts, and other non-text content are correctly exposed.

1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

Not Applicable

No prerecorded audio-only or video-only content was identified in the evaluated Startup Wars application scope.

1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)

Not Applicable

No prerecorded synchronized media requiring captions was identified in the evaluated Startup Wars application scope. 

1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)

Not Applicable

No prerecorded synchronized media requiring audio description or a media alternative was identified in the evaluated Startup Wars application scope.

1.2.4 Captions (Live)

Not Applicable

No live synchronized media requiring captions was identified in the evaluated Startup Wars application scope

1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)

Not Applicable

No prerecorded synchronized media requiring audio description was identified in the evaluated Startup Wars application scope

1.3.1 Info and Relationships

Partially Supports

Accessibility work has been documented for headings, landmarks, lists, tables, tablists, dialogs, radio groups, form labels, and labeled regions across the portals and simulation support UI. Full manual confirmation is still needed across all views and states.

1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence

Partially Supports

Multiple flows have been updated to improve document structure, step flow, reading order, focus order, and modal sequencing. Complete verification across all dynamic application states is not yet substantiated.

1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics

Partially Supports

Labels, instructions, hidden guidance, and explicit status text have been added across many selection, setup, modal, and simulation flows. Broader confirmation is still required to ensure all instructions avoid depending only on shape, location, or visual positioning.

1.4.1 Use of Color

Partially Supports

The reviewed evidence shows improvements to status text, pressed states, focus indicators, and other non-color cues. A full product-wide manual review for color-only meaning is not yet substantiated.

1.4.2 Audio Control

Not Applicable

No autoplaying audio content requiring an independent audio control was identified in the evaluated application scope.

2.1.1 Keyboard

Partially Supports

Many pointer-only interactions have been converted to native buttons, links, tabs, radios, or other keyboard-operable patterns. The application still requires broader end-to-end keyboard validation across all routes and live simulation interactions before a full Supports claim is justified.

2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Partially Supports

Documented improvements include dialog controls, close behavior, step-flow handling, escape handling, and overlay behavior. Remaining manual follow-up is still needed for some dialogs and dynamic interfaces to verify that keyboard users are never trapped.

2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts

Not Applicable

No single-character keyboard shortcuts were identified in the evaluated web application interfaces.

2.2.1 Timing Adjustable

Partially Supports

Many portal and setup flows are user-paced, but the simulations include time-based and session-based behavior. The reviewed evidence does not yet substantiate full conformance across all timing-related scenarios.

2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide

Partially Supports

The reviewed application evidence does not show problematic autoplay media, and several status and loading behaviors have been improved. A complete review of all moving, blinking, scrolling, or auto-updating content across the simulation experience is not yet substantiated.

2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold

Supports

No content flashing more than three times per second was identified in the evaluated evidence.

2.4.1 Bypass Blocks

Partially Supports

Main regions and landmarks are present in key application areas, including important portal pages. A complete and consistent bypass-block strategy across all routes and simulation states has not yet been fully substantiated.

2.4.2 Page Titled

Partially Supports

The application includes document titles and route-level headings, but complete verification that each page and state exposes an accurate and useful title has not yet been substantiated across the full product.

2.4.3 Focus Order

Partially Supports

The reviewed remediation includes improvements to focus order in dialogs, billing flows, cards, dashboards, selection flows, and other simulation interfaces. Complete validation across all routes and dynamic states is not yet substantiated.

2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)

Partially Supports

Meaningful action names and context-aware labels have been added to many controls, including repeated cards, row actions, resource links, and simulation-related actions. Further manual verification is still needed to confirm consistent clarity across the full product.

2.5.1 Pointer Gestures

Supports

No multipoint or path-based pointer gestures were identified as required for the evaluated web application scope.

2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation

Partially Supports

The reviewed evidence shows movement toward more standard controls and safer interaction patterns. Full validation of pointer cancellation behavior across the complete live simulation experience is not yet substantiated.

2.5.3 Label in Name

Partially Supports

Accessible names have been improved across many dynamic controls and card-based interfaces. Full confirmation that visible labels consistently match programmatic names across all views is still pending.

2.5.4 Motion Actuation

Not Applicable

No motion-actuated features were identified in the evaluated desktop web application scope.

3.1.1 Language of Page

Supports

The evaluated application entry documents specify English as the page language.

3.2.1 On Focus

Partially Supports

The reviewed evidence shows reduced reliance on nonstandard focus behavior and stronger keyboard-safe interactions. Full validation across all focusable elements, dialogs, overlays, and simulation states is not yet substantiated.

3.2.2 On Input

Partially Supports

Forms, selectors, and stateful controls have been improved in many areas. Additional validation is still needed to confirm that changes of context occur only when expected across all workflows.

3.3.1 Error Identification

Partially Supports

The reviewed remediation includes improvements to validation messaging, invalid-field handling, and state-aware form behavior. Broader confirmation is still required across all forms and data-entry flows.

3.3.2 Labels or Instructions

Partially Supports

Labels and instructions have been added across forms, setup flows, dialogs, selectors, and simulation support interfaces. The remaining issue is incomplete verification across all product areas rather than a lack of documented remediation.

4.1.1 Parsing

Supports

The current accessibility inventory reports no remaining automated parsing-related issues in the inventoried templates reviewed by the accessibility program. 

4.1.2 Name, Role, Value

Partially Supports

Extensive remediation has been documented for accessible naming, roles, states, and values across portals, shared controls, and simulation support UI. The full application still requires broader validation before a complete Supports claim is justified.

4.1.2 Name, Role, Value

Partially Supports

Extensive remediation has been documented for accessible naming, roles, states, and values across portals, shared controls, and simulation support UI. The full application still requires broader validation before a complete Supports claim is justified.

WCAG 2.1 Level AA

Criteria

Conformance Level

Remarks and Explanations

1.3.4 Orientation

Partially Supports

Many updated pages, dialogs, and layouts show responsive behavior, but full orientation testing across the complete instructor, student, and simulation scope is not yet substantiated.

1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose

Partially Supports

Some form controls expose identifiable purpose, but the reviewed evidence does not substantiate complete implementation of input-purpose semantics across all applicable user-data forms.

1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

Partially Supports

The reviewed evidence documents multiple contrast improvements, including simulation surfaces, text tokens, labels, and focus styling. A complete product-wide contrast certification across all routes and states is not yet substantiated.

1.4.4 Resize Text

Partially Supports

Several layouts and controls have been improved for narrow-width use and resilient text behavior. Complete 200 percent text-resize validation across the full product is not yet substantiated.

1.4.5 Images of Text

Partially Supports

No widespread dependence on images of text was identified, but a complete confirmation across all application surfaces has not yet been substantiated.

1.4.10 Reflow

Partially Supports

Significant reflow-related work has been documented for the surrounding web UI. The essential 2D Phaser gameplay surface is treated as exempt where two-dimensional interaction is fundamental, but the rest of the application still requires continued verification for full product-wide conformance.

1.4.11 Non-text Contrast

Partially Supports

The reviewed evidence shows improvements to control contrast, focus treatment, and non-text indicators in many updated components. Complete verification across all remaining routes and states is not yet substantiated.

1.4.12 Text Spacing

Partially Supports

The application includes documented improvements for wrapping, spacing, and narrow-width readability in several areas. A complete text-spacing regression review across the full product has not yet been substantiated.

1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus

Partially Supports

Tooltip, overlay, and focus-driven content behavior has been improved in several simulation and modal flows. A full product-wide validation of all hover- and focus-triggered content is not yet substantiated.

2.4.5 Multiple Ways

Partially Supports

Users can navigate through route structure, page sections, tabs, dialogs, and major application workflows, but complete validation that all in-scope content is available through multiple independent ways has not yet been substantiated.

2.4.6 Headings and Labels

Partially Supports

Headings and labels have been improved in many portals, dashboards, dialogs, setup flows, and simulation interfaces. Full consistency across all product areas is not yet substantiated.

2.4.7 Focus Visible

Partially Supports

Stronger visible focus indicators have been documented across many updated components and simulation interfaces. The full application still requires broader validation across all states and routes.

2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms

Partially Supports

The application generally supports both keyboard and pointer interaction, but the full simulation experience has not yet been comprehensively validated across all concurrent input scenarios.

3.1.2 Language of Parts

Supports

No mixed-language content requiring separate language-of-parts markup was identified in the evaluated evidence.

3.2.3 Consistent Navigation

Partially Supports

Navigation patterns are improving across the instructor portal, student portal, and simulation interfaces, but full consistency across all routes and states is not yet substantiated.

3.2.4 Consistent Identification

Partially Supports

Repeated controls increasingly use more consistent roles, names, and patterns. Final confirmation across the entire application remains incomplete.

3.3.3 Error Suggestion

Partially Supports

Some flows provide clearer recovery guidance and better validation messaging. Full product-wide evidence for error suggestion across all applicable forms is not yet substantiated.

3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)

Partially Supports

Confirmation and review patterns are present in several purchasing, publishing, and data-submission flows, but complete validation for all applicable scenarios has not yet been substantiated.

4.1.3 Status Messages

Partially Supports

The reviewed evidence documents increased use of live regions, polite announcements, and status messaging across dashboards, selections, billing, and simulation support interfaces. Full validation across all dynamic application states has not yet been substantiated.

Overall Conclusion

Startup Wars has undergone substantial accessibility remediation and demonstrates meaningful progress toward WCAG 2.1 AA conformance across the instructor portal, student portal, and simulation-related web UI. The strongest current statement that is fully supported by the reviewed evidence is:

“Startup Wars Partially Supports WCAG 2.1 Level A and Level AA.”

This conclusion reflects substantial documented progress together with an honest acknowledgment that complete manual validation across all routes, dialogs, assistive technology scenarios, and live simulation states has not yet been fully substantiated.

Accessibility Support

If you experience any accessibility barriers or need assistance, please contact us:

We welcome feedback and aim to respond to accessibility inquiries promptly.